<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And so it begins</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smallchou.com/blog/2007/01/and-so-it-begins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smallchou.com/blog/2007/01/and-so-it-begins/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 04:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: smallchou</title>
		<link>http://smallchou.com/blog/2007/01/and-so-it-begins/comment-page-1/#comment-450</link>
		<dc:creator>smallchou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 08:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smallchou.com/blog/?p=323#comment-450</guid>
		<description>oh, and as for this being more of a problem with the anti-gambling mentality of america, that's bullshit. america has an anti-smoking 'mentality' and we haven't stopped people from doing that in their homes. 

of course there's an anti-gambling mentality. every civilized nation should have that type of mentality. it doesn't mean you ban people from doing it. 

this is about politics and money. it's not about morals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh, and as for this being more of a problem with the anti-gambling mentality of america, that&#8217;s bullshit. america has an anti-smoking &#8216;mentality&#8217; and we haven&#8217;t stopped people from doing that in their homes. </p>
<p>of course there&#8217;s an anti-gambling mentality. every civilized nation should have that type of mentality. it doesn&#8217;t mean you ban people from doing it. </p>
<p>this is about politics and money. it&#8217;s not about morals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smallchou</title>
		<link>http://smallchou.com/blog/2007/01/and-so-it-begins/comment-page-1/#comment-449</link>
		<dc:creator>smallchou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 08:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smallchou.com/blog/?p=323#comment-449</guid>
		<description>let's not get into this argument, because i'm just going to get pissed, but sometimes numbers don't tell the whole story. for a recap, as i was following this particular issue rather closely, let me paraphrase the actual history of this act:

=============

Republicans: "we need another "issue" to hang our hat on that average Americans can't help but back us on. i mean, we could actually try to solve something meaningful, but that would take real work. let's go against gambling, that'll make us look good."

Horseracing Lobbyists: "hey, but we gave you guys so much money! you're just gonna screw us? damn republicans."

Republicans: "oh. oh yeah. well, let's put in a specific section that protects horse-racing. there, that'll do it. let's ban all gambling BESIDES online horse-racing, because THAT'S not gambling. 

note Section 105, http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?tab=summary&#038;bill=h109-4411

hey democrats, we're going to pass this online gambling act, and you guys will look un-american if you don't vote for it. actually, just to hammer this home, let's stick it in the PORT SECURITY bill 

note: http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/109_PL_109-347.html

so you'd be crazy to vote against it. how could you ever win a re-election voting against that?"

Democrats: "oh. we're such pansies. let's roll over and vote for it so we don't look like bitches."

========

so, as i said: thanks, republicans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>let&#8217;s not get into this argument, because i&#8217;m just going to get pissed, but sometimes numbers don&#8217;t tell the whole story. for a recap, as i was following this particular issue rather closely, let me paraphrase the actual history of this act:</p>
<p>=============</p>
<p>Republicans: &#8220;we need another &#8220;issue&#8221; to hang our hat on that average Americans can&#8217;t help but back us on. i mean, we could actually try to solve something meaningful, but that would take real work. let&#8217;s go against gambling, that&#8217;ll make us look good.&#8221;</p>
<p>Horseracing Lobbyists: &#8220;hey, but we gave you guys so much money! you&#8217;re just gonna screw us? damn republicans.&#8221;</p>
<p>Republicans: &#8220;oh. oh yeah. well, let&#8217;s put in a specific section that protects horse-racing. there, that&#8217;ll do it. let&#8217;s ban all gambling BESIDES online horse-racing, because THAT&#8217;S not gambling. </p>
<p>note Section 105, <a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?tab=summary&#038;bill=h109-4411" rel="nofollow">http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?tab=summary&#038;bill=h109-4411</a></p>
<p>hey democrats, we&#8217;re going to pass this online gambling act, and you guys will look un-american if you don&#8217;t vote for it. actually, just to hammer this home, let&#8217;s stick it in the PORT SECURITY bill </p>
<p>note: <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/109_PL_109-347.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/109_PL_109-347.html</a></p>
<p>so you&#8217;d be crazy to vote against it. how could you ever win a re-election voting against that?&#8221;</p>
<p>Democrats: &#8220;oh. we&#8217;re such pansies. let&#8217;s roll over and vote for it so we don&#8217;t look like bitches.&#8221;</p>
<p>========</p>
<p>so, as i said: thanks, republicans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://smallchou.com/blog/2007/01/and-so-it-begins/comment-page-1/#comment-448</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 07:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smallchou.com/blog/?p=323#comment-448</guid>
		<description>The libertarian part of me is not a big fan of the legislation either (although, in principle, it's the right thing to synch up physical and online laws), but note that this is something a large portion of the country is agreement with (majority of Democrats voted for this as well).

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2006-363&#38;sort=party

The gripe shouldn't necessarily be with Republicans, but with the anti-gambling mentality in the United States. There's a good portion of this country, left and right, that believe gambling, like drugs, is a detrimental form of recreation that is easily addictive and life-ruining.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The libertarian part of me is not a big fan of the legislation either (although, in principle, it&#8217;s the right thing to synch up physical and online laws), but note that this is something a large portion of the country is agreement with (majority of Democrats voted for this as well).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2006-363&amp;sort=party" rel="nofollow">http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2006-363&amp;sort=party</a></p>
<p>The gripe shouldn&#8217;t necessarily be with Republicans, but with the anti-gambling mentality in the United States. There&#8217;s a good portion of this country, left and right, that believe gambling, like drugs, is a detrimental form of recreation that is easily addictive and life-ruining.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
